1. it isnt shown till later in the video, but it appealed to the people passing and they started giving more.
2. the video made me sad because in the beginning basically no one was helping out, and it made me sadder to see what the woman wrote on the other side of the sign because she used words to appeal to peoples emotions. it made me feel a little better when more and more people helped out.
3. to show us the power simple words can make when their arranged to mean more.
4. we could use more words that appeal to the readers in what ever tone were trying to create in our stories.
5. they covered the story as first it being a situation where the wolf had done nothing, to it was self defense in the pigs view, to it wasn't possible for the wolf to blow it down, to insurance conspiracy placing the pigs at fault.
6. yes and no, the same plot events occurred but more viewpoints were exposed causing a deeper study into the event which resolved in the impossibility of the wolf being able to blow the house down and what the pigs actually did.
7. the pigs and the people by what they thought.
8. no, all bases were covered.
9. the guardian showed little opinion, they just stated facts, it was the readers who formed opinions.
10. yes
11. by keeping stories unbiased and allowing the reader to form their own opinions by us just stating the facts.
12. by keeping my stories unbiased yet intriguing 
13. deadlines are important and if just a couple people cant pull through the whole team suffers.
14. newspaper is too stressful to me, and i feel as if im not in a safe environment to voice my true opinions
15. i have no ideas of how it can be improved, its a good structure, it just isnt the class for me.